Web-persuasive arguments share a rhetorical structure with three fundamental components: grounds, warrants and conclusions. -additional grounds -valence issues vs. position issues -in sum, claimsmakers present what they hope will be persuasive arguments, but they must then attend to the audience's responses and revise their rhetoric WebGrounds, Warrant, Conclusion. Typifying Example, Name, Statistics Which of the following is NOT a benefit of listening to expert claimsmakers? A. They provide objective facts. B. They use special skills to explore social problems. *C. They have no bias. D. They use research methods. True or False:

Sociology Notes 2 and 3 - Chapter 2-3 - The structure of

http://www.siucmst.org/blog/claim-evidence-and-warrants-oh-my WebBy these statements, she sets the stage for the argument and the conclusion. Grounds The grounds is the basis of real persuasion and is made up of data and hard facts, plus … country stars gravesites

social problems quiz 2 Flashcards Quizlet

WebGrounds: her personal narrative (the people she worked w who had poor living conditions but still worked full time/numerous jobs) Warrants: social justice; these people work hard and numerous hours but can't make a living Conclusion: they should form a labor union and know their worth WebWarrants Explains why something ought to be done. Invokes values and emotions. Claims often feature multiple warrants. Conclusions Statements that specify what should be done. Shaped by grounds and warrants. Often include both short-range and long-range goals. Cultural Resources and Claims Webconstructionists call a. grounds b. warrants c. conclusions d. positions 2) Frame alignment is the way a. claimsmakers must get others to adopt their frame in order to recruit members b. different social movement organizations typically adopt one shared frame c. claimsmakers typically mold their frame to match that of the dominant political party country star says n word